Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: For patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand covers the full costs of surgical and endovascular procedures except for those of embolization coils and assisting devices. Costs and effectiveness were compared between endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping to inform reimbursement policy decisions. METHODS: Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared between coiling and clipping using the decision tree and Markov models. Mortality and functional outcomes of clipping were derived from national and hospital databases, and relative efficacies of coiling were obtained from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Risks of rebleeding were abstracted from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. Costs of the primary treatments, retreatments and follow-up care as well as utilities were obtained from hospital-based data. Non-health and indirect costs were abstracted from standard cost lists. RESULTS: Coiling and clipping contributed 10.59 and 9.28 QALYs to patients aged in their 50s. Under the societal and healthcare perspectives, the incremental costs incurred by coiling compared with clipping were US$1923 and $4343, respectively, which were equal to the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$1470 and $3321 per QALY gained, respectively. Coiling became a cost-saving option when the costs of coil devices were reduced by 65.7%. At the country's cost-effectiveness threshold of US$5156, the probability of coiling being cost-effective was 71.3% and 65.6%, under the societal and healthcare perspectives, respectively. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment for aSAH is cost-effective and this evidence supports coverage by national insurance.

Effects of a national policy advocating rational drug use on decreases in outpatient antibiotic prescribing rates in Thailand

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of a national policy advocating rational drug use (RDU), namely, the 'RDU Service Plan', starting in fiscal year 2017 and implemented by the Thai Ministry of Public Health (MOPH), on trends in antibiotic prescribing rates for outpatients. The policy was implemented subsequent to a voluntary campaign involving 136 hospitals, namely, the 'RDU Hospital Project', which was implemented during fiscal years 2014-2016. METHODS: Hospital-level antibiotic prescribing rates in fiscal years 2014-2019 for respiratory infections, acute diarrhea, and fresh wounds were aggregated for two hospital groups using equally weighted averages: early adopters of RDU activities through the RDU Hospital Project and late adopters under the RDU Service Plan. Pre-/post-policy annual changes in the prescribing levels and trends were compared between the two groups using an interrupted time-series analysis. RESULTS: In fiscal years 2014-2016, decreases in antibiotic prescribing rates for respiratory infections and acute diarrhea in both groups reflected a trend that existed before the RDU Service Plan was implemented. The immediate effect of the RDU Service Plan policy occurred in fiscal year 2017, when the prescribing level among the late adopters dropped abruptly for all three conditions with a greater magnitude than in the decrease among the early adopters, despite nonsignificant differences. The medium-term effect of the RDU Service Plan was identified through a further decreasing trend during fiscal years 2017-2019 for all conditions in both groups, except for acute diarrhea among the early adopters. CONCLUSIONS: The national policy on rational drug use effectively reduced antibiotic prescribing for common but questionable outpatient conditions

No disponible

Effects of a national policy advocating rational drug use on decreases in outpatient antibiotic prescribing rates in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of a national policy advocating rational drug use (RDU), namely, the 'RDU Service Plan', starting in fiscal year 2017 and implemented by the Thai Ministry of Public Health (MOPH), on trends in antibiotic prescribing rates for outpatients. The policy was implemented subsequent to a voluntary campaign involving 136 hospitals, namely, the 'RDU Hospital Project', which was implemented during fiscal years 2014-2016. METHODS: Hospital-level antibiotic prescribing rates in fiscal years 2014-2019 for respiratory infections, acute diarrhea, and fresh wounds were aggregated for two hospital groups using equally weighted averages: early adopters of RDU activities through the RDU Hospital Project and late adopters under the RDU Service Plan. Pre-/post-policy annual changes in the prescribing levels and trends were compared between the two groups using an interrupted time-series analysis. RESULTS: In fiscal years 2014-2016, decreases in antibiotic prescribing rates for respiratory infections and acute diarrhea in both groups reflected a trend that existed before the RDU Service Plan was implemented. The immediate effect of the RDU Service Plan policy occurred in fiscal year 2017, when the prescribing level among the late adopters dropped abruptly for all three conditions with a greater magnitude than in the decrease among the early adopters, despite nonsignificant differences. The medium-term effect of the RDU Service Plan was identified through a further decreasing trend during fiscal years 2017-2019 for all conditions in both groups, except for acute diarrhea among the early adopters. CONCLUSIONS: The national policy on rational drug use effectively reduced antibiotic prescribing for common but questionable outpatient conditions.

Effect of a Rational Drug Use Policy on the prescribing safety in outpatient settings in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: In Thailand, the 'Rational Drug Use (RDU) policy' has been implemented in the Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) hospitals since October 2016. This study aimed to explore the effects of the RDU policy on prescribing safety indicators for elderly patients and those with common chronic diseases. METHOD: Electronic outpatient databases were obtained from 15 MOPH hospitals. The selected indicators were the (1) glibenclamide prescribing in patients with diabetes mellitus who were elderly or had renal impairment; (2) duplicate prescribing of renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers in patients with hypertension; (3) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) prescribing in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5; and (4) long-acting benzodiazepines prescribing in patients ≥65 years. The policy effects in terms of changes in prescribing trends were estimated using interrupted time-series analysis based on quarterly (Q) data. The postpolicy trends (2016, Q4-2017, Q4) were compared with the prepolicy trend (2014, Q1-2016, Q3). KEY FINDINGS: The unsafe prescribing of glibenclamide in patients with diabetes mellitus was 19.2% in Q1, 2014 and decreased significantly due to the RDU policy to 11.0% in Q4, 2017 (-4.23 percentage points quarterly, P < 0.001). The unsafe prescribing of RAS blockers and long-acting benzodiazepines was relatively low in Q1, 2014 (1.0% and 1.1%, respectively) and did not decrease further after the RDU policy. The unsafe prescribing of NSAIDs was 4.2% in Q1, 2014, increased abruptly one quarter after the policy and decreased afterwards. CONCLUSION: The RDU policy seemed to be a contributing factor that decreased the unsafe prescribing of glibenclamide, while the policy effect was minimal for the other indicators.

Effects of restrictive reimbursement on the prescribing and expenditures on non-essential lipid-lowering drugs.

BACKGROUND: The rapid cost escalation of the government employee scheme in Thailand was driven by the overprescription of non-essential drugs (NEDs), which were not listed in the National Lists of Essential Medicines. A restrictive reimbursement policy implemented in October 2012 required prescribers to base the prescription of NEDs on six criteria, including A and B for safety, C for effectiveness, D for availability, and E and F for costs, hence known as the A-F policy. OBJECTIVE: The A-F policy was examined in terms of its outcomes regarding the prescription volume and reimbursement expenditure for lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs). METHODS: Data on LLD prescription in 2012-2015 from outpatient settings in 29 public hospitals were standardized using quantities based on the World Health Organization's Anatomical, Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification and the defined daily dose (DDD) system. The policy effects were estimated using an interrupted time-series analysis. RESULTS: The restrictive reimbursement policy decreased both the prescription volume and the reimbursement value of non-essential LLDs. Within the first month of policy implementation, the percentage of NEDs, as defined by DDDs and reimbursement expenditure, immediately decreased by 15.1 and 15.2% points in provincial hospitals and by 8.3 and 4.4% points in military hospitals, respectively. The prescription of NEDs continued to decrease thereafter, despite there being no statistically significant changes in the trend of decreased prescribing compared with the prepolicy period. The decrease in the prescription of NEDs resulted in the declining reimbursed amount per day and stable expenditure of LLDs as a whole. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness on the A-F restrictive reimbursement on NED prescribing helped stabilize the expenditure on LLDs.

Cognitive impairment, quality of life and healthcare utilization in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3 to 5.

AIM: This study aimed to examine associations between cognitive impairment and quality of life and healthcare utilization in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3 to 5. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 379 outpatients with a mean age of 65.7 years at tertiary care hospitals in Thailand. Cognitive function was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination, and quality of life was measured using the five-dimension European quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) multi-attribute utility instrument. The effects of cognitive impairment on the likelihood of reporting 'no problems' for each EQ-5D dimension, the quality of life scores and healthcare utilization were determined using an appropriate multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of cognitive impairment in patients with CKD stages 3 to 5 was 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.3, 19.9). Patients with cognitive impairment had a significantly lower likelihood of achieving good outcomes in the mobility, self-care, usual activities and anxiety/depression dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L than those with normal cognition. Patients with cognitive impairment had a significantly lower quality of life score than those with normal cognition by 0.06 points (95% CI, 0.01, 0.10). Cognitive impairment increased the number of emergency visits (rate ratio, RR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.45, 8.29). Compared to CKD stage 3, CKD stage 5 decreased the quality of life score by 0.06 points (95% CI, 0.01, 0.10) and increased the rate of hospitalization (RR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.27, 4.12). CONCLUSION: Cognitive impairment in patients with CKD was associated with lower quality of life scores and increased healthcare utilization.

Coprescription of QT interval-prolonging antipsychotics with potentially interacting medications in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: The US FDA has designated pimozide, thioridazine, and ziprasidone as contraindicated for patients at risk of QT interval prolongation, and assigned haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone as associated with a significant risk of QT prolongation. This study aimed to examine trends and hospital variations in concomitant prescribing among these eight selected antipsychotics, and coprescription with interacting drugs known to increase QT prolongation risk. METHODS: Data on outpatient antipsychotic prescriptions during 2012-2015 were obtained from 16 general hospitals and 10 university hospitals nationwide. A time-series analysis was used for estimating trends in coprescription that led to drug interactions. RESULTS: Coprescribing among the eight antipsychotics ranged from 7.5% for quetiapine to 33.1% for thioridazine. The rate of coprescription with contraindicated interacting drugs was 9.7% for thioridazine and 21.9% for pimozide, and increased by 1.1 and 1.4 percentage points (% pt.) yearly for thioridazine in general and university hospitals, respectively. Coprescribing with interacting drugs with precautions was 2.8% for quetiapine, 7.4% for ziprasidone, and 27.9% for risperidone; these percentages increased yearly by 1.7% pt. for ziprasidone and 2.6% pt. for risperidone in general hospitals, as well as by 1.0% pt. for risperidone in university hospitals. The median proportion of patients exposed to a QT-prolonging interaction was 12.3% across hospitals (interquartile range, 9.9-19.5%). Wide interhospital variation was found in percentages of drug interactions among patients receiving thioridazine, ziprasidone, paliperidone, or olanzapine in general hospitals, and among patients receiving paliperidone or pimozide in university hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Coprescription of antipsychotics with interacting drugs that could increase the risk of QT prolongation was common in Thailand, and thioridazine, ziprasidone, and risperidone showed increasing trends. We urge the incorporation of a unified list of QT-prolonging antipsychotics and interacting drugs into a computerized drug interaction warning system, and existing national rational drug use campaigns should cover this important issue.

Ginkgo biloba Extract (EGb761), Cholinesterase Inhibitors, and Memantine for the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and memantine have been reported to provide modest benefits for cognition and aspects of functioning in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb761), a phytomedicine, is widely used and expected to be well-tolerated. A few trials have compared EGb761 with ChEIs, and the results were inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: A network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic benefits and tolerability of EGb761, three ChEIs (donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine), and memantine in mild-to-moderate AD patients. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched through 30 June 2017. We included randomized double-blinded trials with a minimum treatment duration of 22 weeks for EGb761 240 mg/day and 12 weeks for ChEIs or memantine. The study patients included AD or probable AD patients without other types of dementia or neurological disorders. Cognition, function, and behavior symptoms were compared between treatments using the standardized mean difference (SMD). Clinical global impression, treatment discontinuation, and adverse events were compared between treatments using the relative risk (RR). Statistical pooling of the individual trial results was conducted using a frequentist approach. The probability of being the best for a treatment was estimated using surface under the cumulative ranking. RESULTS: EGb761 and memantine showed no therapeutic benefits in all study outcomes. For cognition, all ChEIs were significantly better than placebo (SMD from - 0.52 to - 0.26), and galantamine was better than rivastigmine in the oral and patch forms, EGb761, and memantine (SMD [95% confidence interval (CI)]: - 0.22 [- 0.40 to - 0.05]; - 0.26 [- 0.45 to - 0.07]; - 0.34 [- 0.56 to - 0.12]; and - 0.42 [- 0.71 to - 0.13], respectively). Compared to placebo, galantamine, the rivastigmine patch, and oral rivastigmine provided modest functional benefits (SMD, from 0.21 to 0.24), and galantamine provided behavioral benefits (SMD [95% CI]: - 0.15 [- 0.26 to - 0.04]). All ChEIs provided a better improvement in clinical global impression than placebo (RR from 1.20 to 1.69). The global impression ratings were more improved with donepezil than with galantamine (RR [95% CI]: 1.40 [1.09-1.80]) or with EGb761 (RR [95% CI]: 1.40 [1.06-1.85]), with a 96% probability of donepezil being more effective than the other study agents. Rivastigmine in oral and patch forms, galantamine, and donepezil had a higher risk of being discontinued than placebo (RR [95% CI]: 2.14 [1.49-3.06]; 2.04 [1.30-3.20]; 1.79 [1.28-2.49]; 1.49 [1.03-2.17], respectively). Discontinuation of EGb761 was not statistically lower than that of the ChEIs, in which donepezil had the lowest probability (38%) of being discontinued. CONCLUSION: EGb761 and memantine showed no treatment benefits compared to placebo and ChEIs. Galantamine provided the highest beneficial effect on cognition and behavioral symptoms. Donepezil provided a better clinical global impression and tolerability than the other ChEIs and EGb761, with a similar benefit for cognition as galantamine.

Trends and variations in outpatient coprescribing of simvastatin or atorvastatin with potentially interacting drugs in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess trends and variations in coprescribing of simvastatin or atorvastatin with interacting drugs in Thailand. METHODS: Outpatient prescriptions between 2013 and 2015 in 26 tertiary care hospitals were analyzed for statin coprescribing. The proportion of patients exposed to coprescribing was estimated for semi-annual changes, using a time-series analysis and for hospital variations, using an interquartile range (IQR). RESULTS: The coprescribing of simvastatin with all contraindicated drugs in 10 university and 16 general hospitals, respectively, was 3.6 and 3.1% in 2013, then decreased to 3.2 and 2.6% in 2014 and to 2.6 and 2.0% in 2015. The drug most frequently coprescribed with simvastatin, on a decreasing trend (by 0.19 percentage points) was gemfibrozil (in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively; 2.9, 2.3 and 2.0% in university hospitals, and 2.5, 2.0 and 1.6% in general hospitals). A similar trend was found in atorvastatin-gemfibrozil coprescribing. Patients coprescribed simvastatin with the rest of the contraindicated drugs were relatively stable at 0.6-0.8%. No protease inhibitors were coprescribed with simvastatin and atorvastatin. The IQR of simvastatin coprescribing in the university hospitals was smaller than that in the general hospitals and decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Coprescriptions potentially leading to drug interactions with simvastatin in Thailand were observed although the contraindicated drugs were acknowledged. Mutual awareness among health professionals and the implementation of electronic prescribing should be strengthened as zero drug interaction was possible as in the case of protease inhibitors in the present study.

Access to and price trends of antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and antilipidemic drugs in outpatient settings of the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand.

Under the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) with payment per capita for outpatient (OP) services, hospitals' financial risks will rise if access to essential drugs increases. This study examined trends in access to and price of essential drugs for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and an overall purchasing price index (PPI) for an OP drug basket from public hospitals. To examine drug access, OP prescription data from 2010-2012 were obtained from the UCS. Access to thirteen drugs for diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia was examined for trend using a time-series analysis. To calculate the PPI, drugs in the same dataset in 2010 that each contributed at least 0.2% of the total OP drug expenditure (N = 118 items) were selected together with drugs expected for near future growth (N = 48 items). The PPI was constructed from purchasing prices in 16 hospitals using a standard method developed by the International Labour Organization. Based on 166 drug items accounting for 75% of OP drug expenditures, the overall PPI continually declined by 6.8% from 2010 to 2012. Access to the 13 selected NCD drugs, accounting for 22% of the total OP drug expenditure increased from 22 to 30 per 1,000 population for antidiabetics, 27 to 47 for antihypertensive agents, and 32 to 53 for antilipidemics from 2010-2012. Growth in the study drug recipients was relatively higher than that in the population and diagnosed patients. Due to generic market competition, metformin, glipizide, amlodipine, losartan, simvastatin, atorvastatin, and fenofibrate prices decreased by 6-22%. Antiretrovirals and risperidone prices decreased by more than 10% due to price negotiation by the UCS. Access to essential drugs for diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia has increased. A decline in the PPI could contain essential drug expenditure when the demand for the drugs increased. Generic market competition and price negotiation by the UCS led to price reduction.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Thai Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and a High Risk of Bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a HAS-BLED score of 3. METHODS: Total costs (US$) in 2017 and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated over 20 years using a Markov model. A base-case analysis was conducted under a societal perspective, which included direct healthcare, non-healthcare and indirect costs in Thailand. Clinical events for warfarin and utilities were obtained from Thai patients whenever possible. The efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants was derived from trial-based East Asian subgroups and adjusted for time in the target international normalized ratio range of warfarin. RESULTS: In the base case, use of apixaban instead of warfarin incurred an additional cost of US$20,763 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Substituting apixaban with rivaroxaban and rivaroxaban with high-dose edoxaban would incur an additional cost per quality-adjusted life-year by US$507 and US$434, respectively. Compared with warfarin, high-dose edoxaban had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$9704/quality-adjusted life-year, followed by high-dose dabigatran (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio US$11,155/quality-adjusted life-year). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on a payer perspective were similar. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was below Thailand's cost-effectiveness threshold when high-dose dabigatran and edoxaban prices were reduced by 50%. Changes in key parameters had a minimal impact on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. CONCLUSIONS: For both societal and payer perspectives, high-dose edoxaban with a price below the country cost-effectiveness threshold should be the first anticoagulant option for Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a high risk of bleeding.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of policy options on first-line treatments for advanced, non-small cell lung cancer in Thailand.

OBJECTIVES: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown to be better for progression-free survival than chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFR M+). This study evaluates under the Thai health system context, cost-effectiveness of (A) the use of platinum doublets for all without EGFR testing, and (B) an EGFR test followed by TKIs or platinum doublets conditional on test results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision analysis model was constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and total cost for each option. Cancer progression and death were pooled from randomized, controlled trials. Quality of life was obtained from patient interview, using the European Quality-of-Life, 5-Dimension questionnaire. Costs associated with treatment outcomes were derived from patient chart reviews. RESULTS: Combining the EGFR test with each TKI, gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib if M+ or otherwise platinum doublets, resulted in higher effectiveness than the use of platinum doublets for all by 0.15, 0.19 and 0.21 QALYs, respectively. Among the three TKIs, gefitinib was dominated economically by erlotinib, which incurred an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $46,783/QALY over the platinum doublets for all. Moving to the next best, afatinib resulted in the ICER of $198,961/QALY over erlotinib. Probabilities for any TKIs being cost-effective when compared with platinum doublets over a wide range of willingness to pay were modest. CONCLUSION: In Thailand, the first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with TKIs conditional on EGFR test results was not cost-effective as compared with platinum doublets for all.

The brief serenity scale: a psychometric analysis of a measure of spirituality and well-being.

PURPOSE: This article describes a factor analysis of a 22-item version of the Serenity Scale, a tool that measures spirituality and well-being. METHOD: A sample of 87 participants, enrolled in a National Institutes of Health-funded clinical trial examining the impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction on symptom management post-solid organ transplantation, completed the abbreviated instrument. FINDINGS: Exploratory factor analysis yielded three subscales: acceptance, inner haven, and trust. The Serenity Scale was positively associated with positive affect and mindful awareness and inversely related to negative affect, anxiety, depression, health distress and transplant-related stress. CONCLUSIONS: Serenity, a dimension of spirituality that is secular and distinct from religious orientation or religiosity, shows promise as a tool that could be used to measure outcomes of nursing interventions that improve health and well-being. IMPLICATIONS: Spirituality is recognized as being an essential component of holistic nursing practice. As nurses expand their use of spiritual interventions, it is important to document outcomes related to nursing care. The Serenity Scale appears to capture a dimension of spirituality, a state of acceptance, inner haven and trust that is distinct from other spirituality instruments.

Group behavior therapy versus individual behavior therapy for healthy dieting and weight control management in overweight and obese women living in rural community.

OBJECTIVE: To compare group behavior therapy with individual behavior therapy for promoting healthy dieting behavior and weight control in overweight and obese women in rural community. METHODS: This parallel group, open labeled, randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted from March 2005 to April 2006. A total of 132 overweight and obese women with a mean (S.D.) age of 38.4 (7.9) years and body mass index (BMI) of 28.9 (2.9) kg/m(2) were randomly assigned to receive either group behavior therapy (n = 65) or individual behavior therapy (n = 67). Five intervention sessions were provided biweekly during the 3-month period. Assessments were conducted at months 3, 6, and 12. Primary outcome was mean percentage weight loss at month 6. Other outcomes included anthropometric outcomes, dietary intake, healthy dieting behavior, intention, perceived behavioral control, attitude, and subjective norm. RESULTS: Mean percentage weight loss at month 6 of group behavior therapy was comparable to individual behavior therapy (5.9% (95%CI: 4.5-7.3) versus 5.4% (95%CI: 4.0-6.7)); P = 0.027 for non-inferiority at one sided 0.05 level of significance. Other outcomes were remarkably similar between the two study groups. Attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control improved slightly; whereas, intention, healthy dieting behavior, and dietary intake improved significantly after interventions. High intention and perceived behavioral control was related to greater weight loss. At 1 year, 73% of participants either lost or maintained their weight. Anthropometric outcomes and healthy dieting behavior were significantly better than baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Group behavior therapy was not inferior to individual behavior therapy, and it should be used as the first line mode of behavior therapy for weight control management in a rural community.